User talk:Dowew

This user may have left Wikipedia. Dowew has not edited Wikipedia since November 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Ruth Warrick

I removed the images from Ruth Warrick because I was unsure as to the source. Please cite your sources in more detail. Mike H 08:02, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)

Emmy Award winners category

I don't think the Emmy Award winners category is truly representative, because most of the few entries there are Daytime actors, who should probably belong in a category called Daytime Emmy Award winners, or something to that effect. Mike H 23:26, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)

I can do that for you! :) Mike H 23:40, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)

Soap article policy proposal

Since you edit soap articles, I figure you might be interested in the policy proposal I've brought up on the talk page for the Soap WikiProject. If you haven't done so yet, be sure to sign your name on the regular page, noting that you support the work in such a project. Mike H 08:05, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)

One Life to Live

Hi, I realize that the policy regarding who should be listed under cast is still ongoing but Shanelle Workman has confirmed in numerous sources that she has started taping The Bold and the Beautiful so this isn't exactly a rumor. User:Dowew

Whether or not it's a rumor is not really relevant. Like I stated on the proposed policy page, until the show gets aired, there's no guarantee that she will become a current cast member. As it is now, she just started taping. Many things can happen between now and then that could alter the fate of those tapes; death, bad review from focus groups or viewers, infighting between the cast, etc. It's not unheard of for previous tapings (of anything, not just soaps) to be scrapped and redone, for those reasons. Sometimes you see a character appear in a show and it seems s/he's given more prominence, but then you never see them again. Most people don't think twice about it, but it does happen, and it makes you wonder what happened there. This is an encylopedia, not a gossip or breaking news site. If you have to edit the article in a month because the "current cast member" (who really isn't) won't become one, then I think you're missing the point. --jag123 21:12, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Order of Canada

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I noticed you are adding "OC" to some Officers of the Order of Canada. However, just adding OC is not very helpful, since there's no indication of what the letters tand for. It would be better to add it as [[Order of Canada|O.C.]]. That way readers will be taken directly to the correct article. Cheers, -Willmcw 23:24, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

If your brother is making edits on your account without your permission then I recommend that you change your password. Naturally, you are responsible for what is done by your account. -Willmcw 01:12, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Dowew, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my talk page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log.
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language.

Happy editing!

You didn't do anything wrong. I just noticed that you were a new user, so I posted a "map" of Wikipedia here. → JarlaxleArtemis 06:24, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

Sherlock Holmes

Star Trek (Data) already has a whole paragraph in the "Other Media" section. I don't know that your recent edit is needed, in light of that. Turnstep 16:56, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Book cover

I don't think I took it out because I didn't think she wrote it; I don't doubt that. I took it out because the article in its present form has no room for the other picture. Mike H 23:02, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

Lifetime Achievement

They should be included. An Emmy is an Emmy. Mike H 18:00, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

Proof of Granger and Davis, Jr. awards

IMDb article of One Life to Live awards Please fix this ASAP as Farley Granger and Sammy Davis, Jr. both won awards for 'One Life to Live'.

Baldwin brothers category

This sort of stuff belongs in WP:CFD, not in my user talk page. (I hope you already put it in CFD.) --ssd 05:44, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Order of Canada

I made the corrections and suggestions you have placed on the talk page. Thanks for doing it. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 12:33, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pictures of the Provincial orders

Hey, I would go here, http://www.forces.gc.ca/hr/dhh/honours_awards/engraph/med1_e.asp?cat=3, to get the pictures of the Orders. We can use those under current Canada Crown Copyright rules. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 19:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Victoria Cross (Canada)

After we are done with the Order of Canada, this is my next project. Of course, there is little much we can do with this article than what I have done already, but we can see what we can do. I will try to draw some images, but I have no clue on how the house hunting will go. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 20:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Privy Council

Your assumption that official opposition leaders are automatically made privy coucillors is incorrect. In fact, it's a relatively rare occurance. AndyL 02:00, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Duceppe was offered Privy Council membership some time after 9/11 but refused. Bouchard is a member of the Privy Council by virtue of having been a Cabinet minister and is listed under Mulroney ministers. Day was never sworn into the Privy Council so he is not listed. AndyL 02:02, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Long time no see

Well, what do you think about the two article forks I created for the Order of Canada? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 19:38, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Governor General Chain

Here is the chain I was talking about, with Clarkson wearing it: http://www.cpachter.com/biography/images_biography/1-OC-Apr-2000.jpg. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 18:27, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Smokey Smith

I'm afraid you have the wrong man; while I copyedited the image caption to let the elements flow better, none of the actual content was mine.

Still, good to know you got it all sorted. :D Radagast 02:36, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Bob Welch

Why did you add a reference to Bob Welch being a Privy Councillor when he was not? Homey 21:25, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In future, please check the official list. One doesn't become a privy councillor by virtue of being a provincial cabinet minister. Homey 21:28, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tell your brother then:) BTW, Welch isn't "The Honourable" since provincial cabinet ministers only have that honorific while in office (that's someone else's mistake, though). Homey 21:35, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia style

Please take a look at the Manual of Style. It says:

If possible, make the title the subject of the first sentence of the article (as opposed to putting it in the predicate). In any case, the title should appear as early as possible in the article — preferably in the first sentence.

The first time the title is mentioned in the article, put it in bold using three apostrophes. Here's an example: article title produces article title. You should not put links in the title.

Since "The Honourable", "PC", "MP", "BA", "CC", LLB" and so on, are not part of the article title, they should not be in bold. This is not my preference: this is part of the Wikipeida Manual of Style.

I hope this helps. Thanks, Ground Zero | t 19:55, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm... it is actually most of the articles that you are editing, including Pat Carney, Charles Tupper, and Donald Fleming, hich you have just edited. Please follow WIkipeida style, i.e.,

The Honourable Winslow Percivel Shuttleworth, LL.B., CM, OC,

not

The Honourable Winslow Percivel Shuttleworth, LL.B., CM, OC,

Thanks, Ground Zero | t 05:07, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pepys FRS, BA

Hello Dowew, do you really think that adding FRS and BA after Pepys' name at the head of the article about him improves it?

Surely Samuel Pepys is too well known for that? Being an FRS is a great achievement, but Pepys has even greater claims to fame which are all set out in the Interests and Achievements section.

Please consider changing it back

Thanks Thruston 00:04, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines

Hi Dowew, glad to see you have "uncloaked", and decided to use a proper account rather than just contribute as User:24.103.139.242. I do have a few suggestions for the use of bold facing in the name line: i) Per the Manual of Style, normally only the name itself, or a part of the name reasonably expected to be used as a redirect should be bolded. Therefore prenomial styles should not be bolded (i.e. Honourable would not be bolded, whereas Sir or Dame technically becomes part of the name and is indeed frequently used as a redirect term and should therefore be bolded; ii. Bolding an interpolated nickname is OK, as it is usually an implied redirect term (e.g. John "Bud" Spud could all be bolded because Bud Spud should have been set up as a redirect; iii. Similarily, postnomial honours, which you are fond of adding, would NOT generally expected to be used as a redirect term, and therefore should NOT be bolded.
A related issue is your preference for wikilinks for Sir, etc. in the name line. However, the use of wikilinks within either the name or a part of the name for which there is a reasonable redirect should not be used per the Manual of Style — there is always an opportunity later in the article to mention when the knighthood was awarded, and this is the appropriate time to wiki that link.
Finally, for things like Canadian Senators, you have been adding what essentially amounts to a job title. While it seems like those that are in favour of prenomial styles such The Honourable are generally having their way these days, a term like senator is not really a formal honourific, and there is no need to add these — lest we would be adding continously cluttering up articles by adding prenomial terms like "Author", "Bricklayer", etc. which is clearly pointless.
I hope that you now see why so many of your previous edits have been modified by myself and others, and trust that you will adhere more closely to the prefered guidelines in the future. Please do not hesistate to contact me if you have any further questions. Regards, Fawcett5 13:40, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Parliament Bios

Hi Dowew, thanks for helping out by adding links to the Library of Parliament webpage for Canadian politicians. I just wanted to point out that I usually create these links with a handy template: {{Subst:Parlbio|ID=x}}

Note that the language used by the current version of the template differs a bit from the text I used to put in (and which you are now apparently adding by hand). I updated the language to something a bit more specific, since it turns out the parlbio pages include only federal political experience, not local or provincial. At some point a robot will be going through and changing the old entries to match the new language.... Cheers, Fawcett5 04:31, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WGA Membership

Happy to help. If you have a hard time finding an answer from the WGA, let me know. I hang out at a private BBS for WGA members, and there are a bunch of folks there with a lot of experience and knowledge who might be able to help out.

Best, Jacobw 13:24, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know the results of your research. Interesting stuff. And, by the way, kudos to you for taking it on yourself to write articles about TV writers, who so often get ignored in favor of the more glamorous actors who say the lines the writers wrote!

Best, Jacobw 16:26, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

For your work on Order of Canada, I present you this Barnstar. Thank you. Zach (Sound Off) 01:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Saving Text for later implementation

The Canadian Meritorious Service Decorations are part of the Canadian Honour System. The Decoration was created by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II in 1984 to recognize individuals whose specific deeds or activities over a limited period of time. This period of time is limited to 5 minutes to 5 years.

This is both a military and civilian decoration, and each category have two levels: Meritorious Service Cross (Military and Civil) and Meritorious Service Medal (Military and Civil).

Recipients must have

demonstrated an outstanding level of service; or
set an exemplary standard of achievement; and
brought honour or benefit to Canada

The accomplishment for which a recipient is honoured must have taken place after June 11, 1984.

Dianne L. Haskett, former mayor of London

Haskett was not the first Ontario mayor to be found guilty of a human rights violation. It was Hamilton mayor Morrow who was for not issuing a pride proclamation. That case predated the Haskett case and was used as a precedent in Haskett's Board of Inquiry hearing. Barry Wells 03:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The case involving Hamilton's mayor is cited as Oliver v. Morrow and it was used as a precedent in the Haskett case. Barry Wells 00:05, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Good

"(which Good seems to be selling and promoting exclusively)"

Not that it matters, and not that I disagree with the statement's removal, but I think you misunderstood what that meant. If you go to Matt's official store (at MapleMusic), the Deluxe edition is the only one that's offered. And when he was out promoting the disc, the only version he talked about was the Deluxe one - it was as if the Standard edition didn't exist. -- ChrisB 03:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Screencaps of Adrienne Clarkson

It is not fair use to use copyrighted images on a talk page. These will be deleted soon as orphaned fair use images. -Nv8200p talk 18:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Order of Victoria and Albert

It is correct that no conferments of the Order have been made since the death of Queen Victoria. However after her death the existing members of the Order continued to be members, so there needed to be a Sovereign for the Order. That is why all the monarchs from Victoria to Elizabeth II have become Sovereign (something that would happen automatically, rather than being conferred on them). I expect that there will no longer be any living members of the Order, which as you suggest puts it in the same category as the Order of St Patrick.--George Burgess 10:44, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I knew about the Nickle Resolution

I knew about the Nickle Resolution, because of the Conrad, Baron Black of Crossharbour affair. New Zealand's banning of the conferral of titles has also been condemned by the Monarchist League of New Zealand as well. - (Aidan Work 03:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Canada and fair use

If you are prepared to tag the images as {{Non-free fair use in}} and provide a full fair use rationale, see Wikipedia:Fair use for instructions, for each image then there shouldn't be a problem. However consider that a requirement for fair use is that the image is necessary to help explain the text, adding images of people with a medal for the purpose of decoration is not acceptable for fair use.--nixie 02:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sheila Copps photo

Hi. No, I am not Andy Schott! Someone tagged the image incorrectly. I have fixed it. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:37, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot deleted Adrienne Clarkson's official portrait

Hi,

Unfortunately, your bot deleted the official portrait of former Governor General of Canada Adrienne Clarkson. I assume that this was because it was tagged as Canadian Crown Copyright, which is no longer a valid tag, and should have been replaced with the Canadian Political Figure Tag. Unfortunately, since Clarkson's term came to an end last year I dont believe the image is availavle online anymoreat gg.ca. During her tenure as Vice-Regal representative the image (featuring Clarkson wearing the Order of Canada against a Green Background) was made available in high-quality download free of charge to anyone who wanted an image of the head-of-state, or as a glossy print for a minimal fee. It was most definately fair use since it was created for the purpose of being an official image of the queen's representative. Is there any way to undelete it ? Dowew 22:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OrphanBot keeps a cache of all images it's dealt with, so I've re-uploaded the image. It's at Image:Aclarkson.jpg, and I've tagged it as a "promotional photo". --Carnildo 23:14, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Peerage of Scotland

Hi. I have attempted to answer your question there. Doops | talk 03:48, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:East Coast Music Awards logo with url.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:East Coast Music Awards logo with url.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 09:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daytime Emmy Award Winners

In April 2005 you added the Category:Daytime Emmy Awards winners to an enormous number of people, including David Bowie. I can't find any evidence for that. What is your evidence, please? Note that Bowie has been nominated in 2006, after your posting, and not necessarily for the daytime. The other article I looked at was for Barbara Walters. Do you have evidence for that? Hu 16:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jeffries

what is GCL? Xtra 05:16, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to ask the same thing, but have since found it may be referring to a PNG award called "Logohu (Bird of Paradise) award" [1] which I believe is fairly new and the highest award given in that country. -- Ian ≡ talk 05:39, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone who knows about it should make a page on it so we can link it. Xtra 02:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CanadaLtGovernorswithMichaelleJean.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CanadaLtGovernorswithMichaelleJean.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Canadagovgeneralwithwoundedfriendlyfiresoldiersfromrideauhall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Canadagovgeneralwithwoundedfriendlyfiresoldiersfromrideauhall.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:CanadianConfederationMedal1992CrownCopyright.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CanadianConfederationMedal1992CrownCopyright.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:41, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:OrderofBritishColumbiaCrownCopyright.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:OrderofBritishColumbiaCrownCopyright.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 22:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Callahanandwarrickscreencap.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Callahanandwarrickscreencap.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 22:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Black

Hi Dowew, thanks for your queries.

The KCSG award is made by the Vatican in recognition of contributions to Catholic causes.

Here is the Burke's Peerage with the explanation of the abbreviation: http://www.burkes-peerage.net/code/hith/help/ahp-k.asp
Here is the wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_St._Gregory_the_Great

I originally used a commercial news database to research the KCSG/PC title of Conrad Black.

Those references are not available publicly online, so I found new ones Below are links to official reports and stock filings from various Canadian companies Lord Black of Crossharbour was a director or chairman of. do a word search for e.g. "Crossharbour" in these documents and you'll come across his profile and full title including the "KCSG" and the "PC(Can)". In the case of the first Hollinger link, the PC is notated as "PC(C)", though if you look in the full Hollinger annual reports rather than the 10-K (the annual US securities filing), the "PC(Can)" notation is used in the letter to shareholders from Black. (You can look for the that Hollinger annual report on the Canadian securities filings SEDAR database - http://www.sedar.com/search/search_en.htm ) In the other two filings, from Canwest and CIBC, the "PC(Can)" is used.

I hope that answers you questions. Bwithh 01:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further note - the London Gazette uses the notation PC (Can) see this link. No mention of KCSG there, though its possible that it was awarded after Nov 2001 and/or possibly, as the Queen is the head of the Protestant Church of England, Catholic knighthoods may not be formally recognized in official royal communications of this kind. Bwithh 02:01, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the KCSG was awarded in 2001, according to Lord Black's biography as reported by the UK Parliament's official recorder of biographical details (Note that the PC (Canada) is also used here): Please click on "biog" besides Lord Black's name on this page which may take a few seconds to load Bwithh 02:20, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Images

Thanks for the note about the commons and uploading images. When I get a chance, I'll try and put all those images from Burke's Armory in the commons. Have a wonderful day.--Evadb 11:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the images to the commons. Thanks for the tip.--Evadb 06:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Jamaica

You Wrote:

Hi, thanks for creating the page on the Orders of Jamaica. I just wanted to point out that the Governor General of Canada is not the soverign. She is the Chancellor, in the head of the Orders as proxy for the Soverign, who by their constitutions is the Queen of Canada, currently Elizabeth II.

Thanks for the note. I'm not sure I understand the point of your message. I didn't think that my article implied that the Governor General was the sovereign of the Orders of Jamaica, or any other orders, for that matter. Maybe you can clarify what you're saying for me. Thanks.--E va ^db 20:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You Wrote:

Hi Sorry, I read your article too quickly. I though it said that the GG was soverign. However according to 1 Elizabeth II is soverign of the orders. So who is soverign ? The Jamaican GG ? Also The Jamaican honours system has another page on wikipedia 2. I just found it. Dowew 22:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, according to the Jamaican government's website, it may be the Governor General of Jamaica. The link which gives the Independence Day Honours from 2005, says that the Governor General is making appointments to these orders on the advice of the Prime Minister. If you contrast that to the Canada Gazette Order of Canada appointments in 2001, it would seem that the appointments were made by Adrienne Clarkson "in her capacity as Chancellor and Principal Companion of the Order of Canada". This would lead me to belive that she is not actually the soveriegn of the order. In Jamaica, the appointments seem to be made in a different capacity. I'm hoping that this makes sense because I'm not sure I get it!? Have a nice day.--E va ^db 07:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...I've been trying to fix up and clean up some of these Jamaican honours articles. You can see some of it at Jamaican honours system. Let me know what you think and you are welcome to help improve it.--E va ^db 09:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Thomson of Fleet

See my edits. You might like to have a quick look at Heir Apparent and then compare to Heir Presumptive You'll see I've removed the daughters which aren't really needed if the presumptive is included but I would like to tidy it up. In an ideal world we would have the full name of the HP in his father's article so that it would be easy to see the who the hp is from that. Atm the second baron's children are listed listed as "three children: David, Peter and Lynne." I presume Ken is a second name of the second son or somesuch. If so if you know the full names that would help clarify things. Alci12 13:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Charles SOM

I received the information from the Wikipedia article on the order. --Ibagli 14:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found a press release about him being made an honorary member of the order, and another one about Prince Edward receiving it. --Ibagli 15:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Guypaulmorinpaintingfromnationalgalleryofcanada.jpg

Hello, I'm just wondering why this image is considered public domain? The website linked doesn't seem to say that it is free of copyright. - SimonP 21:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Canada / Queen Mum

Well, the Queen Mum was the wife of the King--she was a Queen consort, not a sovereign. This is different from Queen Elizabeth II, who is our sovereign. The Queen mum was in some ways what Prince Philip is. Of course, it's a bit different, since wives of reigning kings are queens, but husbands of reigning queens are not kings. The point, I think, is that there is no argument--she wasn't Canadian, and she wasn't sovereign over Canada, so the argument of Canadian citizenship by sovereignty over Canada doesn't work either. Oz Lawyer 23:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

British Commonwealth Honours Systems

Have you ever thought about writing articles on these such as the honours systems of such countries as Zimbabwe,Pakistan,India,South Africa,& the Maldive Islands? You can insert Category:British Commonwealth Honours Systems at the bottom of each article. - (124.197.12.114 04:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I`ve never considered writing articles about them as I am not familiar with them. The best I would be able to do is a hack job based on a few web sources. And lets face it, if someone wants to learn about them everyone can do a goggle search :) --Dowew 15:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dowew,have you thought about writing articles on the honours systems of each of the Canadian provinces? - (222.152.211.6 03:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

They already exist.--Dowew 23:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Man in Image

Thanks for the clarification. --Deenoe 12:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Privy Council Cases

Dowew,have you ever thought about writing an article called List of Canadian Privy Council cases? This would contain a list of civil,constitutional,& criminal cases that were appealed from the Canadian courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.It is interesting to note that the final Canadian case before the JCPC was decided in 1959 - 10 years after the Act of Parliament abolishing all Privy Council appeals. Lists of cases for the various provinces such as a List of Nova Scotian Privy Council cases should be compiled,as there is interest in these from people studying case law. - (202.180.98.221 03:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I don't have the knowledge or time to do that. Dowew 06:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images of John Ralston Saul

Hi.

I sent you a message a while back while you were on holiday but you didn't respond to it (its above on this page). OrphanBot deleted an image of Dr. John Ralston Saul called Bigphotojonralstonsaulcc.jpg on 09:52, 7 April 2006.

This was Dr. Saul's official photography from the website of the Governor General of Canada (Saul was Viceregal consort of Canada). The photo was taken by Rideau Hall which is linked to the Department of National Defence of Canada. I know this means it was not Public Domain, however, it was produced with the intention that it be readily available to the general public. It was available in high resolution downloan on www.gg.ca, and was also available for free as a glossy print to anyone who called a 1-800 number or wrote to Rideau Hall (for example if the Royal Canadian Legion wanted a new photo of the Vice-Regal Consort...a really useless role and im sure there weren't many requests).

Since there is no pd alternative, I think it can safely be reuploaded and put on the page as either a promotional photo or as an official canadian politician photo {{Canada-politician-photo}} (although the vice-regal consort, as consort to the head of state is above politics...but Saul openly questioned the Government of Paul Martin so he really wasn't...

Anyway, he was going to speak at my University and I was going to print off that photo for him to sign, but it was gone. And since he and Adrienne Clarkson are no longer in office the photo is not available on gg.ca anymore. If you can't reupload it, can you possible e-mail it to me ?

Thanks Dowew 08:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you've got the image name correct? OrphanBot's logs don't show it ever having encountered an image with that name. --Carnildo 07:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In responce to your post above, yes, the name is correct see [[2]]. Does OrphanBot delete the log after a while or something ? Dowew 20:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OrphanBot didn't remove the image from that page. It was removed on May 23, 2006 by 69.195.23.55, and deleted on July 13 by Petros471 as an unused fair-use image. You might be confusing this with OrphanBot's removal of Image:Jrs jyt230.jpg on April 7. The image was deleted recently enough that it's probably possible to undelete it; try contacting Petros471. --Carnildo 05:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored Image:Bigphotojonralstonsaulcc.jpg, tagged it with the fair use template you suggested and added it to John Ralston Saul. To make sure the image stays as fair use in the article it might be a good idea to upload a lower resolution version. Petros471 13:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MBE medal

Hi Dowew,

It's mine (awarded 2000) - I simply put it on the scanner plate and scanned both sides of it... -- ChrisO 09:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:IonaCampagnola.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:IonaCampagnola.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Agent 86 06:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rushton study

HI ya, if you happen to have a link to an on-line version of the campus paper with that quote you mention, please post it. Best Regards, Pete.Hurd 22:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a scan would be great, thanks! Pete.Hurd 21:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

politician vs. political candidate

The term politician “... includes people who hold decision making positions in government, and people who seek those positions ...”

As both past leader of a political party that ran election campaigns, and as a candidate himself, Jim Harris is certainly a politician since he has been “seek[ing] those positions”. —GrantNeufeld 06:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote:

“By that definition of politician, wouldn't someone running as a candidate for the Official Monster Raving Loony Party be considered a politician ?”

Yes. Anyone who runs for political office is by definition a politician. Just because you don’t like to think of them as politicians because you consider their campaigns to be “fake” does not change the definition of the word. Being unsuccessful at winning an election does not in any way diminish the fact that a person who runs for political office is a politician.

You wrote further:

“The term politician, is far too broad to be used for everyone who has ever run for political office.”

No. It is definitely a broad enough term to encompass precisely that: “This includes people who hold decision making positions in government, and people who seek those positions,…” In no way is the term limited to “people who successfully seek…” or “people who seek with a perception that they have hope of actually achieving…”

—GrantNeufeld 18:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

Got 'em, Thanks! Pete.Hurd 21:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvia Fedoruk

The photo that you inquired about (Image:Sylvia Fedoruk.jpg) is from the following site: http://www.collectionscanada.ca/women/002026-819-e.html If you have any more questions, let me know. Thanks for your help! Scotwood72 06:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BRoy Style Guide

I've just created a proposal for our Style Guide - HERE - please do discuss it on the talk page // D B D 12:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Canada

I think http://www.flickr.com/photos/pmorgan/90904649/ could replace the photo we have of Anka getting his order from Clarkson. We could always crop the other lady out, since the photo is under the CC-BY license and we can modify it. How does this work for you? User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 01:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons & Me

Hi there. In response to your message about uploading images to Commons, I am indeed registered there and upload images to the site. I usually decide whether to upload an image to Commons depending on the perceived likelihood that an article on the subject would be created in another language's wiki and I confess to thinking only of Denison as Lieutenant-Governor of Van Diemen's Land when uploading the picture. --Roisterer 02:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ClarksonandQueen2005.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ClarksonandQueen2005.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu Badali 15:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IonaCampagnola.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IonaCampagnola.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 15:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BRoy titles templates poll

Hi, Dowew! I've just started a poll about Category:British royal titles templates, and would really value your input - please do have your say! Cheers, – D B D 13:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Clarksoncap1.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Clarksoncap1.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Img359.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Img359.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ClarksonSaulRemembranceCC.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ClarksonSaulRemembranceCC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of the Prime Ministers of Canada

Think you can help try and save this article? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of the Prime Ministers of Canada. Thanks! -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is this order ?

As 2 months have passed, I'm giving you a link to your question in Juan Carlos I talk page.

talk:Juan Carlos I of Spain#What is this order ?

Regards, Maurice27 05:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Katharine of Aragon

Hello there. Just wondering if you could give some advice on a debate on the Catherine of Aragon page regarding the spelling of her name. There is some heated discussion on the discussion page, could you drop by and add your thoughts?? CheersPaul75 01:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kenojuak Ashevak

I don't really see how the Order of Canada is the same as a Service medal. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. THe only thing is that other well meaning people who know she has the medal but not the background are likly to think of it as as service medal. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wikipedians by number of total starsList of users by number of total stars

I have just started a article with the title mentioned above. Perhaps it would be interesting contributing\starting with me to this list; it might be fun if their is some kind of a competition between several users, to be on top of that list! Maybe some people would go and work harder, do more, contribute more, and vandalise less! Not take it 'too seriously; its just for fun, and feel free to add yourself to the list! So, what do you say?

the Old and respectable Kashwialariski 16:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Clinton

Sorry about the revert on Bill Clinton and the Order of Logohu calling it silly vandalism. However, despite the fact that it's real, it isn't notable, and I would have still reverted it. Orangemarlin 02:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ClarksonRemCC.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ClarksonRemCC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Order of the Rising Sun

Heya,

Are all works by the US Federal Government or Military public domain ? I found [3] this image of an American office getting the Grand Cordon of the Order of the Rising Sun and think it might highlight an expanded article on the subject. Dowew 03:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we can use the photo. Works by the Federal Government and the US Military are public domain. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 03:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LeonardCohenCCarticle.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:LeonardCohenCCarticle.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Email

zscout370 at hotmail dot com. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 01:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They should be fine, but I am not sure where I would put the images. Plus, they are always welcome on the Wikimedia Commons. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 03:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:ClarksonandQueen2005.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ClarksonandQueen2005.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 23:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask for help

Would you mind add some references of the Inter-service decorations of the United States military?

Thank you.--东北虎(Manchurian Tiger) 08:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Kimcampbellofficialportrait2004.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Kimcampbellofficialportrait2004.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 03:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wessex Children

Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at WikiProject British Royalty. Yours in anticipation, D B D 16:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PaulAnkaOrderofCanada.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PaulAnkaOrderofCanada.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 20:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Smokeygoldenjubilee.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Smokeygoldenjubilee.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Smokyuveil2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Smokyuveil2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Inlovingmemoryofruthwarrickscreencap.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Inlovingmemoryofruthwarrickscreencap.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense of Rage Epilepsy

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rage Epilepsy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rage Epilepsy provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rage Epilepsy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ruth citizen kaneDame.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ruth citizen kaneDame.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rage Epilepsy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rage Epilepsy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Rage Epilepsy. Eubulides (talk) 03:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to User talk:Eubulides #Rage Epilepsy deletion: Althoug the article was a candidate for speedy deletion, the candidature failed; it was not speedily deleted. The article then went through the process for an ordinary deletion, and was eventually deleted. The basic argument, as I recall (the talk page is now gone), is that rage epilepsy is a soap opera diagnosis: as far as we could tell, the term "rage epilepsy" first appeared in Melrose Place in 1997. See its 5th season summary, and see the Jump the Shark comment that says "Give me a break though. Peter is a DOCTOR and has no clue whatsoever that there is no such thing as rage epilepsy?? Did he even get a second opinion? Did he open up a textbook from MEDICAL SCHOOL to see what horrible "disease" he was "suffering" from??? NO. He simply fell into Taylor's trap and acted like the moron he was." Nobody could find any reliable medical or scientific source on the subject of rage epilepsy. The sources cited by the former Rage Epilepsy article never mentioned "rage epilepsy". Eubulides (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Reeves

Hello. I've been looking at the history of the article on Paul Reeves (sometime archbishop and governor general of New Zealand) and see that you seem to be the first person to have said that he is a Knight Bachelor. As I mention on the talk page for that article, I am not convinced that this information is correct. I wonder whether you could say where you got this information please. For some time I have been coming back to this article hoping to find that the mystery has been resolved!--Oxonian2006 (talk) 02:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VictoriaCrossSilverDollarCanada.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VictoriaCrossSilverDollarCanada.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's Service Order

Hi, I undid the undo you made to the article, because the text is not free (as stated in the comment to rev. 132911764). I'm just telling you this to avoid any misunderstanding, and to emphasise that its not vandalism on my part. The original website the text was copied from, is http://www.beehive.govt.nz/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=29454 .

Thanks, 118.90.118.57 (talk) 11:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, although I think since its factual information we can probably find a NZ press release on it...the redoing of the categories is a pretty significant change. Dowew (talk) 00:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Prince/ss X of Wales" Issue

Just thought I'd let you know that there's a discussion about the above at the WikiProject, and I'm inviting all of the members to join in D B D 13:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Phoebescreencap1.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Phoebescreencap1.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Project FMF (talk) 14:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aaliyah I Care 4 You album cove image.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aaliyah I Care 4 You album cove image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CanadaLtGovernorswithMichaelleJean.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CanadaLtGovernorswithMichaelleJean.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 16:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Leicester

I have removed your recent addition to the article Earl of Leicester, because your reference is to Thomas Coke, 1st Earl of Leicester (fifth creation). However, I have amended that article to add a link to Codex Leicester. I hope you will regard this as a more satisfactory solution than your amendment. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FrancescaJamesasKellyColeTylerscreencap2005.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:FrancescaJamesasKellyColeTylerscreencap2005.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:PaulAnkaOrderofCanada.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:PaulAnkaOrderofCanada.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Queens1977GoldenJubileeMedal.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Queens1977GoldenJubileeMedal.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:CanadianCrossofValourbetterimage.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:CanadianCrossofValourbetterimage.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SaskatchewanCentennialMedal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SaskatchewanCentennialMedal.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC/U

There is currently an open Request for Comment on User Conduct here, regarding G2bambino. As someone with past interactions with him, you are invited to comment. — [ roux ] [x] 15:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time for resolution

Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! D B D 15:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SmokeySmithin2002OBC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SmokeySmithin2002OBC.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in...

I am withdrawing from all monarchy-related articles, for reasons listed at AN if you really want to know. But.. I saw this rather surprising move as I was clearing out my watchlist. You might wish to investigate--looks like more POV unsupported by references. [ roux ] [x] 19:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Clarksoncap4.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Clarksoncap4.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 01:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Silverroyalvictorianmedalcrowncopyright.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Silverroyalvictorianmedalcrowncopyright.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Silverroyalvictorianmedalcrowncopyright.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Silverroyalvictorianmedalcrowncopyright.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:OrderofManitobainsigniacrowncopyright.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:OrderofManitobainsigniacrowncopyright.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victoriacrosscanadapostagestampimage.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Victoriacrosscanadapostagestampimage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:CanadaLtGovernorswithMichaelleJean.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:CanadaLtGovernorswithMichaelleJean.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Dowew! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 144 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

David Lago - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Judy Wilson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Charity Rahmer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DVD Exclusive Awards

A tag has been placed on DVD Exclusive Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Waiwai933 (talk) 18:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CoppsWorthFightingFor.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CoppsWorthFightingFor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CoppsWorthFightingFor.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CoppsWorthFightingFor.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:EileenHerliewithRuthandBigLoumeetingVerlain1995.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EileenHerliewithRuthandBigLoumeetingVerlain1995.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Frances Heflin bad screencap.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Frances Heflin bad screencap.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for Order of Canada

I have nominated Order of Canada for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. You are receiving this notice because you have been identified as one of the top three editors of the article based on edit count. Brad (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Olderruthwarrickscreencap.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Olderruthwarrickscreencap.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of Companions of the Order of Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Group of Seven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thanks for adding that pertinent info to Order of Canada. However, please use a reference template for inline citations, not bare urls. The templates can be found at Wikipedia:Citation templates. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 17:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alphaville (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cruz

First, if the name of the category doesn't apply, it doesn't apply. It is not down to people who object to rename the category to cure your mistake. Second, your sources aren't reliable ones for the proposition that he is a Canadian citizen. Third, this topic has been discussed on the talk page in the past, and it is now your responsibility to gain consensus there before insisting on your edits again. Fourth, Geoff Davis hasn't been in that category since October, so sorry, but that is a bad example. Finally, why is it so important to you to flag up his Canadian connections in the categories? And if so, why keep insisting on such a weak choice of category? -Rrius (talk) 13:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. v/r - T P 02:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to King's University College (University of Western Ontario) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Vince Agro]] - Former Mayor of [[Hamilton, Ontario]], [[Giller Prize]] nominated author (BA 1962

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:52, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Lowry (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Lowry (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lowry (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charity Rahmer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charity Rahmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charity Rahmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of people who have resigned from the Order of Canada for deletion

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people who have resigned from the Order of Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have resigned from the Order of Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dowew. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dowew. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dowew. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dowew. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian expatriates in foreign political positions has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canadian expatriates in foreign political positions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 14:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Canadian expatriates in foreign political positions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Canadian expatriates in foreign political positions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canadian expatriates in foreign political positions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TM 16:38, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VictoriaCrossSilverDollarCanada.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VictoriaCrossSilverDollarCanada.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard J. Schmeelk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richard J. Schmeelk, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 09:20, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Richard J. Schmeelk concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Richard J. Schmeelk, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard J. Schmeelk

Hello, Dowew. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard J. Schmeelk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 06:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion notice

An article that you have been involved in editing, r.e.: Soapy Awards, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going >>>here<<<, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. HistoricalAccountings (talk) 13:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Chevolleau for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Chevolleau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Chevolleau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Salimfadhley (talk) 09:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]